Tuesday, May 30, 2023
The problem of people
Tuesday, April 11, 2023
In which I abandon utilitarianism
Okay, to be fair, I've never really described myself as a utilitarian. I find utilitarianism to be a handy rule of thumb when considering policy issues or charities to donate to. The things that prevent the most suffering, or make the most people happy, are the best ones. These are two different things, but in everyday ethics it doesn't even matter which you use. "Saves the most lives" is another good one. It's just a way to come up with a unit you can measure interventions by, to pick the most effective one.
But I've always known it gets a little wonky when you try to use it for everything. For instance, should you have another child? Well, it will cause suffering if you do that, so by negative utilitarianism you shouldn't. But it will also cause happiness, so by positive utilitarianism, you should. And if you try to expand it universally, it comes to either "everyone should have children, provided each child is likely to be even slightly more happy than miserable," or else "no one should have children, ever." Neither one of those seems like a very good answer to me. (I think you should have a child if you want one, personally. Whichever the "right" option is, there are plenty of people choosing each, and you will not be saving or damning the world personally by the one you pick.)
But I haven't thought about it much in a while, till recently I came upon two things that made me think utilitarianism is much worse than I realized. Sure, it might have been handy when used casually by people who also have other ways to do ethics and quickly abandon ideas that lack common sense. But some people want an ethical system to replace common sense, and when used that way, utilitarianism becomes as rapidly disastrous as most theoretical systems.
The first thing I ran into was the concept of longtermism. It's an offshoot of effective altruism (the people who say we should give to the charities that do the most good--which seems unarguably a good idea). Longtermists point out that there may very well be more people in the future than there are alive today. And if we want to do the most good, shouldn't we worry more about future generations?
So far, not too bad. I mean, I certainly don't want to set humanity up for a future where we either destroy ourselves or have miserable lives. That's why I care about the environment--well, that and my fondness for going outside.
But, as I read further, things started to get weird. For instance, there was the idea that, given a billion times more humans might live in the future than do in the present, harm to those future humans is a billion times more important than the lives of people who, you know . . . actually exist. Then, they dream up a possible extinction scenario that might happen. Does it have a .0001% chance of happening? Well, then preventing it takes priority over saving the life of any individual alive today. Because after all, a tiny risk to a very large number of people is like murdering a moderately large number of people, right?
My first objection to this is the math. All of these problems should be multiplied by the certainty that your efforts are going to help at all. The farther out in the future we look, the less we know, and the more vanishingly small become the odds what we do will make the slightest difference. Next, we could refute it by saying that a person alive today might have one billion descendants, so saving his life is saving a billion potential people, so really, it's more efficient to save lives now than to plan to save future lives. Third, we could point out that future humans, since they don't exist, have no real rights. If they did, we'd have to live in moral terror, knowing that every butterfly we diverted from its course might wipe out one billion and create a different billion. That's . . . that's not how ethics works.
But that is just introductory stuff. Once you get into their actual dream of the future, it gets weirder. (By they I mean: a few cranks I read on the internet. It doesn't really matter who, the stuff just got me thinking. I'm sure there are better longtermists.)
These people think the ultimate future of mankind is to somehow upload ourselves into computers. In this scenario, we can simply program ourselves infinite bliss. We can be thousands of times happier than any person alive today. So in that way, our descendants matter much more than anyone can possibly matter today, because we can only be mildly happy at best (everyday life being what it is) whereas they can be perfectly happy, potentially forever.
In service to this end, they think it's justified to ignore any issues around today, focus on creating AI, plan to colonize other planets, and so on. If whole continents of people are lost to war or climate change, that's small potatoes. So long as any humans survive (preferably the most privileged ones, as these are the most likely to invent the tech we need to reach this future) it's all good.
I stopped, at this point. I didn't need to read any further or do any more math. I simply thought: these future digital people are nothing to me. They are not human in any sense I care about. I sense no connection to them. And I don't see why I should want them to exist.
Utilitarianism could bring people to thinking that endless techno-bliss is worth fighting for, just because someone, somewhen, could be happy. But my common sense says no. I do not want endless techno-bliss. I want my species to survive, sure, but that's not my species anymore. I want to prevent actual suffering by actual people alive today. I care about a homeless guy getting to come inside when it's cold, and medical care in another country so that a mom doesn't have to mourn her child. These things are real. The rest is . . . simply not.
So that was the first thing. I realized that utilitarianism can take you to some weird places, and maybe instead of working out better math (which I think you can, it's completely valid to) I can simply drop the whole idea.
The second thing was a pair of books by Hank Green, An Absolutely Remarkable Thing and A Beautifully Foolish Endeavor. Both are fantastic, especially the second one, and I won't spoil them because I think everybody should read them.
But they brought up the question, from the perspective of an extra-terrestrial, about what the best future of humanity is. From that perspective, humanity is not a collection of individuals, it's a beautiful system of interconnection, which has a destiny to be and do great things.
But from another perspective, it's too dangerous to let humanity try to achieve any of that. So doesn't it make more sense to plug us into a digital matrix and dream away the rest of our future? We won't be unhappy. We'll be pacified. We won't be able to harm other societies. So what if we don't achieve anything further, don't do or dream or make contact with the rest of the galaxy?
The negative outcome in that book is the dream of the longtermists. Plugged in and happy.
It made me see why I reacted with such strong disgust to that idea in the first place. Infinite happiness isn't the way humanity has ever lived, or how it was meant to live. We always have a bit of dissatisfaction--and that can be a good thing! It drives us to do more. You don't get the Star Trek future of exploration and achievement by being contented.
I tried, when I was very depressed some years ago, to get into Buddhism or Stoicism. They promised to hold the secret to happiness. That secret is to stop desiring. If you're sad, it's because you wanted something and didn't receive it. If only you wanted nothing, you would be happy.
Then as now, I recoiled. I want to be happy because I've earned it somehow. I don't want a happiness that is simply an absence of desire. I can even be happy while desiring more.
Happiness can be kind of a treadmill. You wanted a big house, you thought if you had a big house you'd be happy. Now that you have it, you're no longer conscious of it. If you lost the house, you'd be sad. But you aren't happy now--now you want a house by the beach.
I've noticed this in my career as an author. I wanted to get good at writing, and I did, but I wasn't happy. I wanted a book deal. So I got a book deal, and was I contented? Heck no! Now I want to sell a zillion copies and get good reviews. I see other authors who have achieved all that, and are they contented? Nope! They're afraid their next book won't do so well, they want to be a bestseller, they want a Hugo Award.
But . . . to me, this isn't misery. This isn't an outcome to be feared. This is the nature of being human. Sure, we could all do a little better to appreciate what we have. And there are goals we strive for that aren't really worth the effort--stuff like being popular or rich, which are both black holes of your effort that never pay as much back as you hoped.
But wanting? striving? having dreams? I want to live like that. When I play a video game (Stardew Valley, naturally) I enjoy the part where I'm building up the farm. When it's all perfect and I've achieved everything, I'm bored.
A good life, to me, includes both happiness and striving. Smelling the roses and digging a fresh garden bed. I want to always have dreams. When I think of a positive future of humanity, I don't imagine people plugged into a vast network where we can't feel the slightest discomfort. I imagine a future where we've learned how to achieve the different parts of a good life in a sustainable way. Communities the right size to really get to know your friends. Art that we can all participate in without needing to make a living off it. Homes that rest easy on the earth, without extracting resources that aren't replaced.
Looking at my life, I feel I maybe haven't been striving enough. I've been trying to protect my mental health and my energy by taking it easy on myself. I've been reading a lot, playing some video games, taking walks. And that's fine, I don't feel guilty since I get my work done. But it hasn't done as much good for my mental health as I hoped. Thinking over all I've said here, I think maybe I should be striving a little bit more. Every time I'm drafting a novel, I feel much busier, but I'm also more happy. I like working on a difficult problem and making progress. The same with crafting--I can sew or weave happily the whole day long without feeling restless the way I do when I'm just scrolling the internet.
I've wandered far from the topic of ethics. I don't have an answer for what to do instead of utilitarianism. I'd hesitate to substitute it with "the good life," because everyone has a different idea of what that is. Instead I'd just say, when your ethical system leads you to ignore good sense, you need a new one.
But I think that considering only happiness and suffering is just not enough. What kind of happiness? What kind of suffering? I'm happy to work to reduce suffering such as poverty, sickness, and death. But I'm not going to try to change who I am as a person so that I don't suffer. Instead, I'm going to try to pursue goals that are meaningful to me, and see how that goes.
Monday, February 27, 2023
Three basics of parenting autistic kids
When Marko was diagnosed with autism, I spent a lot of time stressing out. I wanted to know what this meant for my parenting. Where was the book that would tell me how to raise him? Where was the expert that was going to come and tell me what to do?
What I didn't realize right away was that I already had a leg up on any expert or book, because I had been raising him already for seven years. At this point, I've been raising an autistic kid for almost 13 years, and another one for six, and it's safe to say that I kinda know what I'm doing.
Especially as nobody else knows any better. Books exist, but some of them are dead wrong, and others simply can't tell you everything you need to know about your kid because the variation in autistic children is vast. I would argue it's much greater than the difference between a neurotypical kid and an autistic kid. I did read lots of books on autism, some of which seemed to be describing something very different than my kid, and some which had some helpful tips. Memoirs by autistic people actually helped the most, because what I really wanted to know was what was going through my child's head. When you know that, you can figure out what to do about it much more easily.
I could probably write a series of posts about this (and I might) but for today I just want to say: it's not complicated. It's just parenting. You have the same goals as other parents have, and while some of the tactics in standard parenting books will not work, plenty will. And that depends more on your kid than on whether they're autistic or not. Sensitive kids do not take well to yelling. Spirited kids hate to be told what to do. Some kids love when you joke around (Jackie does) and some will get more upset when you're silly (like Marko).
One of my main worries at the time was, do I try to change his autistic behaviors, or do I treat them as hard limits beyond which he can't grow? Should I be frantically trying to catch him up to his peers, or shrugging and watching them sail by?
In the end, it wasn't a helpful question. The real question is, which skills does an autistic child need and which behaviors are harmful? You should help them develop the skills they will need in life and guide them away from behaviors that harm themselves and others. Exactly like you do with other kids. But you need to have a lot of inner strength to stop yourself from comparing to peers, separating out the autistic side of your kid from the rest of the kid (you can't. your kid is your kid), or letting other people tell you to panic more. The person who tries to make you panic more is almost never a person giving you helpful advice. Either they're panicky themselves about autism, or they're trying to sell you something, but either way they clearly aren't here to help you.
Here are the three most vital skills I can think of for autistic kids. Though I am sure this is influenced by the specific ones I have; yours may be different.
1. Regulate their emotions
2. Detect and regulate their sensory needs
3. Communicate needs to others
These are skills everyone needs, and autistic children may struggle with them more than others. There are many other skills autistic children struggle with: speech, fine motor skills, stylish dressing, detecting sarcasm, etc. But many of these are kind of optional, when it comes down to it, or they will naturally be getting some help with them at school. If you have an autistic child, you need to let go of the idea of your child being cool in school. They may eventually develop their own brand of coolness, but it's not a thing you can make happen. If they struggle with speech or writing or numbers, go ahead and nab all the therapy that seems useful, but be aware that some autistic kids won't catch up to their peers on these. You just can't know.
But these three are going to be vital, and the bulk of teaching them is going to rest on you, the parent, because you are there in more situations, when the need for them arises.
Emotional regulation
Not every autistic child struggles with this, but it seems like most do. I have seen arguments that autistic children only melt down a lot because they're treated so much worse, but I don't think it's just that. I have a sample of two autistic kids and two neurotypical kids, and the autistic ones just freak out more about the same size problem. Apparently the emotion parts of the brain are straight-up bigger in autistic kids.
At the same time, I'm not going to just roll with a house full of unhappy screaming. Let alone the physical aggression and property damage. I want my kids to be able to meet their upset feelings and work their way through them. At the same time, I don't want them to become repressed or self-hating.
I think a lot of emotional regulation problems stem from not being able to detect and name emotions, so that's step one. "I am upset, this is what upset feels like." This lesson alone took us years. And then "I can pause between becoming angry and acting on it." And last, "I have strategies to calm myself down."
This is all a work in progress. As kids are growing, you're not getting to step three on every meltdown. My main efforts lately are stopping them from hurting anyone, eventually de-escalating, and bringing the child to a point of being able to reason again. This looks like taking the angry child to another room, sometimes distracting with a conversation about a topic they like or giving them time to read or play a game, and then talking through the issue. How did you feel when that happened? Do you think it helped to scream at him? What could we do instead? Let's go back downstairs and ask him if he would like to play the game later.
To that end, I also bargain with my kids a lot. I want them to know that no is not a hard wall they have to crash into and then melt down, but only a roadblock on one specific avenue. What if they could still get something they want? So, no ice cream today, but maybe we could put an ice cream date on the calendar. Or we could go home and have the ice cream in our freezer. Whatever.
And I never, ever set boundaries on the kids just for the heck of it. If there's no reason I can explain, well then I guess you can take a bath with your swimsuit on. You can go to school with your shirt on inside out. I'm going to encourage the whole underpants thing but that's not a hill I'm going to die on. With an autistic kid there are so many hills. You can't die on them all.
Sensory regulation
Everyone has a zone of sensory stimulation where they're happy. Maybe you're bored if you don't leave the house every day and you enjoy noisy parties, but after two hours of loud music you want to go home. Well, autistic people have a much narrower band of sensory comfort than other people. This may mean being over sensitive to some things, like textures or tastes or noise. But it also sometimes means they get twitchy and restless if they don't get to jump up and down, swing on things, or crash into the walls. So all the time you're working on giving your children the sensory things they need and protecting them from the ones they can't stand.
When your child is small, this is mostly your job. Your child can't communicate why that shirt is a bad shirt, but eventually you figure out it's tight on the armpits and go looking for shirts that aren't. You may learn how to bake veggies into muffins to avoid unpleasant textures, or give your kid hot sauce so there's a nice strong taste and they eat more food. It's a whole trial-and-error process. There's a growing market of items like ear defenders, seamless clothing, sensory swings, and compression garments to help autistic kids get into the zone where they're happy. There will be way fewer meltdowns this way, the child will be much more free to learn and relax and make friends and eat food when they are comfortable.
But while you're working on this, a lot of society is on the opposite track. They think sensory needs are a thing we fill for small children and have to train out of as they get older. Do they really need the headphones still? If they don't actively complain, we should take them away! And all that hand flapping or chewing on things is getting annoying, let's train them to stop.
The problem is that this strategy does not actually expand a child's zone of sensory comfort. It only gets them used to spending most of their time outside of it. They are under more stress, learn less, and are less happy. They may eat less and lose weight, but since they're a teenager now it's called an eating disorder instead of a sensory issue. They often melt down the second school is over.
It burns my cookies. Instead of transitioning to less sensory adaptation as children get older, we need to transition to children regulating their own sensory needs. They need to learn how comfort feels in their body and what tools they have to get there. I am 36 years old and I'm still working on "am I feeling listless because I am overwhelmed, or because I am bored?" If that's a struggle for me, it's obviously a struggle for a 12-year-old too. But it's so important to teach this, because at some point they'll be an adult and will need to keep themselves in their own sweet spot. And they may have to advocate for themselves about it. So at this age, we should be encouraging kids to understand their needs and ask for what they need. First from us, then from teachers and other adults. A child who can ask the teacher, "Can I please sit in the front, it is too loud in the back," is a child who will eventually grow up to say, "Can I work from home? I'm much more productive there."
Communicating Needs
This follows off the last one. Unfortunately autistic kids can sometimes be their own worst advocates. Some, of course, don't speak. Others can be amazingly articulate so teachers don't realize they don't know how to ask to use the bathroom.
I hardly know what advice to give, because communication difficulties vary so much and I'm only doing middling well at teaching this. Marko can ask to use the bathroom now, but he's constantly missing assignments in class and is terrified to ask the teacher for permission to turn them in late. A work in progress. And Jackie, for reasons I can't hope to understand, sometimes refuses to say "I would like some strawberry-kiwi juice, please," but will trace the letters SKJ on my stomach and expect the juice to arrive.
I think it's vital to accept every attempt at communication and encourage it. The last thing we want to teach is that efforts to communicate aren't worth it. We don't always know what is preventing a child from communicating in the way we might prefer. So refusing to comply until they communicate the way we want can result in the child getting frustrated and giving up. It is okay to become something of a telepath when it comes to our children's needs, detecting that "zzz" and a vague gesture toward the top cupboard means "raisins" or "I'm just going to change my clothes, no reason" means "I have had an accident and feel embarrassed, please play along." What we are teaching is that attempting to communicate is good and gets you things you want. Demanding "please" or clear enunciation often trips the stubbornness switch and they'll just climb on the counter and try to get their own dang chips.
When Marko was about four to seven years old, he refused to talk to any adults outside the family. He had a really pronounced stammer at the time, but even when it was important, he wouldn't even try. I finally found out--after years of this!--that he had noticed that adults in the family understood him when he spoke but adults outside the family often didn't, or didn't have the patience to let him finish his sentence. So he figured, why bother. It was considered "selective mutism" but what I call it is very sensibly saving his breath on people who might not listen. Once he went to school, he quickly overcame it because the adults at school asked him questions and waited and waited and when he finally did try answering, they listened patiently.
So always listen, even if the communication is a sign, gesture, tugging at you, sidelong vague passive-aggressive comments, whatever. And then after you've listened, you can suggest other ways. "You know, you can say 'strawberry kiwi juice' in words, I would have understood that one a lot faster." "Can you hand me your card next time instead of dragging on my body? I like that more." "Once upon a time, there was a little girl who peed her pants, and she decided to tell her mom, 'I had an accident, can you find me some fresh pants?' And her mom was not mad at all! The mom said, 'Thanks for telling me,' and got her some new pants." (This last is a real story that actually, to my shock, worked.)
When it comes to hard conversations, like talking to a teacher, our kids will need our coaching. I've sat by Marko and helped him draft emails to his teacher. I've sent him to go and talk to the counselor while also shooting off an email to the counselor saying, "I have sent Marko to you, please talk to him if he doesn't approach you." We don't expect our kids to be able to do things the first time without us holding their hands.
* * *
This list is obviously not exhaustive. There are a heck of a lot of other important things to teach autistic kids. But these are my main focus right now. I know that my kids will be on the way to building their own successful lives if they master these skills. None of these skills have to do with being less autistic, and all of them are about achieving their own happiness.
In another post, I hope to write a list of general tips about managing autistic kids. There are so many things I've learned along the way that baffled me at first. Parenting autistic kids is not mainly a list of hacks (which is why I decided to leave the other one in drafts and publish this one first) but I'm pretty sure we all need more hacks.
Sunday, January 1, 2023
It's that time of year
- Go on a vacation.
- Submit the next book to agents.
- I'd like to look into taking some classes at the community college in the fall.
- I have already found a pool I would like to purchase a membership for in the summer.
- Finish my solar sailing trilogy and keep looking for a small publisher for it.
- Keep writing and submitting short stories.
- I want to make sure to take my boat out a lot in the coming year.
- I made it into a by-application-only online writing seminar, which terrifies me, but I'm going to do it. (I mean, I paid my money so now I can't chicken out.) Hopefully that will be good for my career and my ability to handle zoom.
- I wrote a romance, which I hope to revise and then do something with. I'm considering self-publishing something after my book comes out, hoping to coast on my improved reputation (if . . . anyone likes the book, that is).
- I've got my novel coming out in July, so that's one thing that's definitely happening. I hope to talk to some bookstores about carrying it and maybe doing a launch event. I am so bad at that kind of thing. But I may end up even doing some podcast and youtube interviews. I gotta do my best for my book right? No matter how terrified I am of being perceived?
- See an endocrinologist.
- Get that stuck wisdom tooth out finally.
- Keep prioritizing my mental health: go outside, exercise, don't spend too much time on social media, do creative things.
- Go to two science fiction conventions. I am dreading both, but maybe I could meet some people or publicize my books. I feel like they could be fun if I could only get the hang of them. One of them, luckily, is close enough I won't have to sleep away from home.
Wednesday, December 14, 2022
A web content writer's take on AI
My day job, as many of you know, is writing web content. Basically just writing informational articles for a company to put on their blog. It's a great job because I can do it at home, I can do it part time, and the money is pretty good for the time I spend on it. And, of course, I've been blogging regularly for 18 years, so you could say I have some experience.
But I realized recently that a lot of people don't understand what the job of writing web content is, or why it's a bad thing for this job to be automated.
Web content started to be popular when companies realized their websites weren't ranked as highly in search results unless they had recent updates on them. It made sense to run a small blog. At first, this was just something anybody at the company did, perhaps mentioning recent updates to their services. But more and more, they realized it could be helpful to hire someone to produce quality content and post it often. People searching for the answer to a specific question, like, "Why is my toilet overflowing?" would land on the page of Gold Star Plumbing, and as often as not, they'd go, "Huh. These guys seem to know what they're talking about. I'll give them a call."
As search engines developed more and more methods of finding good results, content writers had to keep up. This process is called search engine optimization (SEO) and involves stuff like including keywords, subheadings, and pictures to convince Google and its competitors that your page is high quality and has the answers people are looking for.
This led to a golden moment in the history of the internet. Companies with no real interest in educating the public for free still created lots of informative content for you to find and read, just on the off chance you might need their services at some point. And they employed armies of writers at decent wages to provide this service. Any big company tends to run at a certain surplus, and some of that got rolled into providing a real good for humanity. I love it when that happens.
So, my job consists of four things:
- researching a topic so that I can provide accurate facts for the readers
- putting the information in my own words--plagiarism is theft
- explaining it clearly, in a way that's easy to read
- optimizing the content so search engines can find it (and, by extension, my company)
We are living in a world where artificial intelligence (AI) is taking over jobs that were once reserved for humans. The question of whether an AI can write a novel has been asked many times. And the answer is yes, an AI can write a novel.
The question of whether or not artificial intelligence can write a novel is a difficult one to answer. It’s not just about the ability to generate text, but also about the ability to generate compelling and engaging plots.
AI-novel writing software is still in its infancy stage and it is hard for them to create engaging plots, which is what makes writing novels so challenging. However, there are some use cases where AI writing software has been used successfully such as generating content for an online course.
Some people might think that the quality of the novel would be lower than if it was written by a human, but this isn’t always true. There are many examples of novels written by AI that have received praise from readers. One such example is “The Day A Computer Writes A Novel” by Patrick Malone and David Levy, which was published in 1973.
It starts out okay. Not the world's best writing, a little cliché and redundant, but we're used to that already. (This is because a lot of web content already is of very poor quality, produced for low pay and in a hurry. The problem, you see, starts before we introduce the machine--a pattern we can see with industrialization everywhere.)
But then you start to notice contradictions. First the answer is yes, then it's difficult to answer, then it's still in its infancy, and then suddenly there's the wild claim that AI has written lots of novels that readers loved, even back in the seventies!
I can tell this is wrong, because a) I know that AI can't yet write novels, and b) this wasn't edited even enough to look convincing. But at times, some of this content may reach the level of being believable, and then it becomes truly dangerous.
Because AI can't think. It can't consider the truth of falsity of anything. You could probably train it to seek out legitimate sources, but it still wouldn't be able to tell what's fact, what's fiction, and what's speculation. It could go looking for sources about what to do about headaches, find a passage about paleolithic treatment for headaches, and recommend drilling a hole in your skull. Because hey, the encyclopedia said that's a thing!
Ah, you might say, but a human could oversee it. That's true. Very often we think of machines doing things, when really, machines are tools allowing humans to do more things in the same amount of time. Like the self checkout. It's not checking out my groceries for me. It's allowing one cashier to supervise the checkout for 10 people at once. This cashier is way more harried, doesn't have time to trade pleasantries with me, and I'm doing most of the work myself and having a terrible time, but--efficiency is improved, which is what capitalism cares about.
So, okay, the content writer has been fired and the boss is using Jasper. But the results are pretty wonky, so the boss calls the writer back up. "I don't need to hire you as a writer at 10 cents a word," says the boss. "But it says here in your ad that you'll edit for 2 cents a word." Okay, sure, says the freelancer. It takes her two hours to write an article, but only ten minutes or so to edit one, so she figures 2 cents a word is fair.
Unfortunately, the job is way more than editing. She's having to fact check every claim and ends up rewriting most of it. It took an hour and a half, and she only made $20, bumping her hourly rate from $50 to $15.
So she complains to the boss. "This work is a lot harder than editing a human," she says. "It basically only did a quarter of the job, the SEO stuff. I want 8 cents a word at least."
The boss looks at the text Jasper wrote, and then at the text the writer edited. Sure, the latter is clearer, more accurate, and the only one a human would ever want to read. But then he thinks, "It's not my company's job to inform the public for free. I really only want to boost my site in the search results." He calls back the editor and fires her. Every day, a thousand more words of misinformation go up on the internet, and it doesn't hurt his bottom line much at all.
Already search engines aren't as good as they used to be at finding good material. Remember when you used to search for something and get sites run by hobbyists in the field, collecting every single fact available on the topic? Now all the top ten results are the exact same six facts, in the same obnoxious contentese ("Most of us have wondered about this question. To find out the answer, read on!"), covered in so many animated ads it's hard to find the text. AI will only accelerate the decline. And it will become even less possible to hold anybody accountable for plagiarism and misinformation, because nobody actually wrote the text at all. You can hardly blame the boss for something he didn't write.
Now I can tell you this is a bad thing that will take jobs from people and make the internet worse. But that won't stop it from happening. I'm not sure, at this point, that anything will. An informative internet was always a bit of a lucky break. We all benefit from it, but nobody makes money creating it except on the edges here and there.
I hope that many businesses will realize this stuff hurts their reputation. Mine, at any rate, is counting on attracting human eyeballs and educating real people so they are in a good financial position to eventually hire their services. Nobody shares an AI-written article with their friends except as a novelty. You can't go viral with that stuff.
I also hope search engines evolve a bit to reward good sites, whether it's by measuring what sites people click on, allowing us to report bad content, or learning to detect the markers of AI. They, at least, have everything to gain here, because their service is not usable unless they do. However, I worry that their real customers are the businesses they point you to, and they will be more worried about upsetting those businesses than about serving you machine produced word salad.
We will see what's to come. I find myself depressed that we finally got artificial intelligence, and instead of a kindly robot who can teach me the meaning of human existence, I got jumbles of words and surreal pictures with distorted hands. This was not the future science fiction promised me.
Wednesday, November 16, 2022
Goodbye to Pandora
Today, I said goodbye to my beautiful cat of 13 years, Pandora (Kitty Kitty to her friends).
I'd always had cats, but John swore when we got married we wouldn't have any, because he did not like them.
Six months later he got me a cat for Christmas because of course he did.
She was a teeny-tiny little thing, found on the mean streets of Philly by some college students. But she didn't get along at all with their other cats, so they put her on Craigslist and passed her on to us.
She was terrified at first. She spent her first week hiding behind the washing machine; all we saw of her was a pair of yellow eyes. Another time I couldn't find her anywhere and thought she'd escaped, when we found her behind an open dresser drawer.
But after a while she warmed up and turned into a very affectionate, one-person cat. She loved me and only me. She demanded to sit on my lap or, if I had my laptop on my lap, would get on the back of the couch and purr against my shoulder. Every single day, if I was home, she was snuggling with me.
She did not like it when we had kids. The nerve. Marko once tried to play with her and she scratched his face. She wasn't having it. She especially hated the dog, when we brought him home. Honestly I'm not sure what we expected. Gilbert always respected her space, having been smaller than her when we got him, but she never relaxed around him.
She had a spot to nap out of his reach, on my desk, and she kept me company every day, despite all the other chaos that was going on.
Then we moved, and she decided the only part of the house she liked was the basement. I tried and tried to convince her otherwise: no dice. But when Gilbert had been shut up for the night, she would come upstairs for a little snuggle sesh on the couch.
We will eventually not be sad anymore. At some point we will get another cat, hopefully one that Tiger gets along with. Loving cats hurts because you know the whole time it won't be forever, and then it's not and you're somehow still surprised. But I'm not going to stop doing it. They are beautiful creatures whose time with us is always worth the pain of loss.
But today, I'm crying because when the kids go to bed tonight, she's not going to pop up to cuddle with me. I wish she could.
Saturday, October 22, 2022
It's somehow fall now
My parole from fulltime parenting has finally come. Jackie started kindergarten. I've been looking forward to this moment for YEARS and it finally happened!
I was terrified Jackie wasn't going to adapt well. The open house before school started was a disaster. The teacher hadn't seen her IEP, called Jackie "Jacqueline," and had that name on her desk and cubby and everything. Way to give the worst possible impression to a kid already skeptical about the whole business. Jackie spit at her and called her stupid and basically made her worst impression possible.
And yet, once the first day of school rolled around, she was actually fine! She loves her teacher now. Her name has been fixed on everything. She has a best friend she plays with every recess. She always gets ready fast on weekday mornings and wants to go wait at the bus stop 20 minutes before it's time.
Everyone else is doing fine in their new classes. Marko is in Advanced English, which is exciting for him. His grades aren't great, because he keeps missing assignments and not asking for help, but he's learning a lot and trying. I just hope the teacher understands it's an executive function issue, not a lack of effort. Michael is in robotics club a second year running and is also learning the cello. To me, it's just amazing that they give a kid a cello and lessons for free. I want a cello and lessons for free! That was never an option at any of the schools I've been to.
Miriam likes school less this year, because her best friend is not in her class. But she's still doing extremely well and is pulling As in everything because of course she is. I worry about her perfectionism, but I'm proud of her hard work.
John quit his library job and is a project manager now. I feel bad about this, because I think he could have loved libraries if his particular library hadn't been so dysfunctional. Plus a pandemic. Plus underfunding and understaffing and libraries being expected to solve all societal problems simply because they're the only place people can go. But he's very happy in project management and is working from home. It's so nice that he doesn't have to spend hours and hours every week fighting DC traffic.
Of course I feel like a colossal fool for moving here only one year before he stopped needing to commute. We could have stayed in our old house! We can, of course, move back, but moving is so stressful for everyone and everyone's finally settled in at school, so it feels impossible to consider doing it again. It took me a year to even feel comfortable here. I don't want another year where I feel homesick and homeless because I don't feel like home in the perfectly good house we moved to.
Having Jackie in school had an instant positive effect on my mental health, as I hoped it would. She's just a lot, and I need quiet time to recharge. Now I finally have some.
It did not, however, increase my productivity as much as I thought it would. I have all this time! How is it taking me all that time to do my work, run a couple errands, and occasionally clean the house? My hope was to make a schedule for myself that made my responsibilities routine. I can do just about anything if it's a routine. Unfortunately, that routine keeps getting thrown by other things. I get sick, or a kid gets sick, or I get a bad headache. Every fall I get lots of headaches, and I still don't know why.
So it could be better, but honestly being productive isn't everything. I'm doing the same amount of paid work as before, but I don't feel massively stressed about it. I'm getting book deadlines done. The house looks slightly better than it did during the summer. And I feel significantly better about all aspects of my life.
But my prior ideas of taking on more freelance work or maybe taking some college classes feel ridiculous. With what time? With what energy? Would I maybe have more energy if I had some scheduled activities? But what if I did and it just made me stressed all the time again?
Since I don't know the answer, I'm sticking with this for the present. Just getting done the stuff I need to, and maybe having a little more time for my hobbies. Hopefully going outside a non-zero amount, at least until the weather gets cold. And once it does, maybe making a weekly visit to the local indoor pool.
How are you all doing?